• If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Introducing Dokkio, a new service from the creators of PBworks. Find and manage the files you've stored in Dropbox, Google Drive, Gmail, Slack, and more. Try it for free today.

View
 

SLEWC

Page history last edited by Alan Hartley-Smith 4 years, 7 months ago

Installations

 Home

Introduction

SLEWC: Standby Local Early Warning System for UK MOD

 

Input from John Brown

BACKGROUND TO THE LEAD-UP TO SLEWC

With the English Electric Lightning F1 supersonic interceptor starting to be introduced from mid-1960 onwards, there was a view within Fighter Command that controllers might now need computer-aided facilities to carry out their work effectively; however, there was nothing available from the Royal Radar Establishment (RRE) at that time. In early 1962, John Burrow, Manager of the recently formed Aircraft Direction Division of Elliott Brothers (London) Ltd at Borehamwood, visited RAF Bentley Priory (Fighter Command’s HQ) seeking new business, and indicated that his engineers had foreseen this need and devised a scheme, using the Elliott 803 commercial computer, to control markers on a radar display, which could be used for tracking and providing interception data. The system was being called ‘FIREBRIGADE’.

 

At this point, I will digress for a moment: John Burrow had been the Marconi Radar Division lead salesman for ‘FUR HAT; however, having been successful in winning that contract, he soon after left the Company and went to Decca Radar, and later moved on to Elliott’s, where he was joined by Eric Kirk and Iorwerth Evans, both of whom he had valued highly at Decca’s.

 

A formal proposal was submitted to Fighter Command in April 1962, for one FIREBRIGADE system to be fully integrated with a Console 64 Phase 1a system. It would enable hostile and friendly aircraft to be tracked, and also provide control data for up to 12 simultaneous interceptions; the RAF could thereby evaluate the usefulness of computer-assistance in an operational setting. It was offered at an attractive fixed price, and a guaranteed delivery date; a contract was signed two months later.

 

FIREBRIGADE was installed at RAF Patrington and was extensively evaluated; it provided the fighter controllers with invaluable experience in the actual use of computer-assisted information, and paved the way for the later SLEWC installations at Boulmer and Neatishead, both of which used the more advanced Elliott 920c computer. FIREBRIGADE remained in operational use until April 1974, when Patrington closed as a result of Defence cuts.

 

By the late 1960s, NATO had re-assessed its defence philosophy, and changed its stance from the ‘Trip-Wire’ to one of ‘Flexible-Response’. The vulnerability of the centralised L1 building was acknowledged in this new scenario; furthermore, by the beginning of 1970, it was self-evident that the RAF West Drayton LINESMAN system would not be able to fulfil its full operational role. Thus the RAF decided to provide interception control and tracking facilities at Boulmer and Neatishead by the installation of SLEWC (Standby Local Early Warning and Control). The two other Master Radar Stations at Buchan and Patrington would carry on as previously. The two SLEWC installations, using the Elliott 920c computer (incorporating the experience acquired from FIREBRIGADE) became operational around 1972.

 

Input from Tom Vellacott
I was posted to Neatishead in 70 and then in 71 went on courses at Borehamwood for the data handling system and Chelmsford for the displays etc. RAF shifts started working in SLEWC at Neatishead from 71 onwards, although there was still a Marconi presence until late 73. There was also a SLEWC at Boulmer and the only difference, as far as I can remember, was that Neatishead had a simulator used to train the ops people.

 

Input from Steve Bousfield

The input from Tom Vellacott is correct. The SLEWC system at Neatishead did indeed have an integrated simulator, though a standalone but connected one was later added at Boulmer.

 

The SLEWC  data handling systems were designed to be transportable, though they never were, and used very expensive ATR style packing rather than conventional 19in racks. The 920C computer was itself a militarised unit in an ATR case.

 

The simulator that was added at Boulmer was a more ‘commercial’ beast. It used the commercial version of the 920C computer, the 905, and its simulation hardware was packed in 19in racks

 

Maybe there should also be some mention of the GL161 systems which preceded SLEWC and which were fully transportable, including the radar. They were Elliott / Plessey systems but did an essentially similar job as SLEWC.  They used the Sperry TPS34  V-beam tactical radar. The RAF ordered 6 of these systems and the electronics were, as far as I can make out, of an earlier generation to SLEWC. The early systems used 920A or 920B computers ( I don’t know which).  Singapore certainly inherited one of these systems but as to where and when they were deployed, I don’t know. Perhaps someone can shed some light.

 

Installations
Home

Comments (1)

Ian Gillis said

at 5:41 pm on Feb 14, 2016

Page checked

You don't have permission to comment on this page.